Skip to main content

Real life Example

Real-Life Example: Analyzing and Modeling a Stock's Daily Returns

Suppose you have a time series of daily continuously compounded returns for a particular stock over the past year (252 trading days). You want to analyze this series to understand its properties and potentially build a model to forecast future returns (although, as we know, this is very difficult!).

1. Data Preparation and Stationarity Check:

  • Data: You have a series of daily returns: r_1, r_2, r_3, ..., r_252.

  • Stationarity: Before building any models, you need to check if the return series is stationary. You can do this by:

    • Visual Inspection: Plot the time series of returns. Look for any obvious trends or seasonality. Returns should fluctuate around a constant mean level.

    • Statistical Tests: Perform statistical tests for stationarity, such as the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test or the Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin (KPSS) test.

      • Assume the tests suggest the return series is stationary. If the series were non-stationary, you might try differencing it (calculating the series of r_t - r_{t-1}) and then testing for stationarity again.

2. Exploring Autocorrelation:

  • ACF and PACF: Calculate and plot the Autocorrelation Function (ACF) and Partial Autocorrelation Function (PACF) of the return series.

  • Interpretation:

    • ACF: The ACF shows the correlation between the return at time t and its lagged values (e.g., r_t and r_{t-1}, r_t and r_{t-2}, etc.).
    • PACF: The PACF shows the correlation between the return at time t and its lagged values, after removing the effects of the intermediate lags. For example, the PACF at lag 2 shows the correlation between r_t and r_{t-2}, after removing the effect of r_{t-1}.
    • Typical Findings for Returns: You might find that the ACF and PACF of the returns themselves show little or no significant autocorrelation, especially at short lags. This suggests that the returns are close to unpredictable using simple linear models based on past returns.

3. Investigating Volatility Clustering:

  • Squared Returns: Calculate the squared returns: r_t^2 for all t. Squaring the returns emphasizes the magnitude of the return, regardless of the sign.
  • ACF of Squared Returns: Calculate and plot the ACF of the squared returns.
  • Interpretation: You will likely find that the ACF of the squared returns shows significant positive autocorrelation, especially at short lags. This indicates volatility clustering – periods of high volatility tend to be followed by periods of high volatility.

4. Modeling (Illustrative Example - AR(1) for Squared Returns):

  • Hypothesis: Because you observed autocorrelation in the squared returns, you might hypothesize that an AR model can capture some of the dynamics of the volatility.

  • AR(1) Model for Squared Returns: You could fit an AR(1) model to the squared returns:

    r_t^2 = φ * r_{t-1}^2 + ε_t

    Where:

    • r_t^2 is the squared return at time t
    • φ is the autoregressive coefficient (captures the persistence of volatility)
    • ε_t is a white noise error term

  • Lag Operator Notation: Using the lag operator, this can be written as:

    (1 - φL) r_t^2 = ε_t

  • Estimation: Estimate the coefficient φ using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression.

  • Interpretation: If φ is positive and statistically significant, it suggests that past squared returns (a proxy for volatility) have a predictive power on current squared returns. A value close to 1 indicates high persistence of volatility.

5. Limitations:

  • This is a simplified example. A more realistic approach to modeling volatility would involve using models like GARCH (Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity) models, which are specifically designed to capture volatility clustering and other stylized facts of financial returns.
  • Predicting returns is inherently difficult. While we might be able to model the volatility of returns to some extent, predicting the direction of returns is much harder.

In summary, this example demonstrates how the lag operator and the concept of stationarity are used in analyzing financial time series. While simple AR models may not be adequate for capturing the full complexity of financial returns, they provide a starting point for understanding the dynamics of volatility and the importance of time series analysis in finance. This example also highlights the use of ACF and PACF plots in identifying potential time series structures within financial data.

Back to top