Skip to main content

Social Appraisal

Rationale for Social Cost Benefit Analysis (SCBA), Approaches of SCBA

Rationale for Social Cost Benefit Analysis (SCBA):

Social Cost Benefit Analysis (SCBA) is a systematic and comprehensive evaluation of the social, economic, and environmental impacts of a project. It goes beyond traditional financial appraisal to assess the project's broader effects on society and to determine whether the project is desirable from a societal perspective. The rationale for SCBA stems from the following:

  • Market Failures: Markets often fail to accurately reflect the true costs and benefits of projects. Externalities, such as pollution or congestion, are not always priced into market transactions, leading to inefficient resource allocation. SCBA aims to correct these market failures by incorporating the social costs and benefits into the decision-making process.

  • Equity Considerations: Traditional financial appraisal focuses on the profitability of the project for the investors, without considering the distributional effects on different social groups. SCBA takes into account the impact of the project on poverty, inequality, and access to essential services.

  • Environmental Sustainability: Environmental impacts are often ignored in traditional financial appraisal, leading to unsustainable development. SCBA incorporates the environmental costs and benefits of the project, promoting environmentally responsible decision-making.

  • Public Interest: Public sector projects, such as infrastructure development, are undertaken to serve the public interest. SCBA helps to ensure that these projects are aligned with societal goals and priorities.

  • Resource Allocation: SCBA provides a framework for comparing different projects and allocating scarce resources to those projects that generate the greatest social benefits.

Approaches of SCBA:

Two prominent approaches to SCBA are the UNIDO Approach and the Little-Mirrlees (LM) Approach.

  • UNIDO Approach:

    • Origin: Developed by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO).
    • Focus: Emphasizes the use of shadow prices to reflect the true social value of inputs and outputs.
    • Steps:
      1. Financial Analysis: Conduct a traditional financial analysis of the project to determine its profitability for the investors.
      2. Adjustment for Market Distortions: Identify market distortions, such as taxes, subsidies, and price controls, and adjust the financial prices to reflect the true social costs and benefits. Shadow prices are used for this adjustment.
      3. Adjustment for Income Distribution: Assess the impact of the project on different income groups and assign weights to the benefits accruing to different groups.
      4. Adjustment for Savings: Consider the impact of the project on savings and investment and assign a premium to savings if savings are considered to be socially desirable.
      5. Adjustment for Merit and Demerit Goods: Adjust the prices of goods that are considered to be socially desirable (merit goods) or socially undesirable (demerit goods).
    • Advantages: Relatively simple to apply and widely used in developing countries.
    • Disadvantages: Can be subjective in assigning shadow prices and weights.

  • Little-Mirrlees (LM) Approach:

    • Origin: Developed by Ian Little and James Mirrlees.
    • Focus: Emphasizes the use of world prices as a measure of the opportunity cost of resources.
    • Key Concepts:
      • Tradable Goods: Goods that are traded internationally should be valued at their world prices (border prices).
      • Non-Tradable Goods: Goods that are not traded internationally should be valued at their shadow prices, which reflect the opportunity cost of producing them domestically.
      • Consumption Rate of Interest (CRI): The rate at which society is willing to trade off present consumption for future consumption. Used as the discount rate.
    • Steps:
      1. Identify Tradable and Non-Tradable Goods: Classify the project's inputs and outputs as tradable or non-tradable.
      2. Value Tradable Goods at World Prices: Value tradable goods at their world prices (adjusted for transportation costs and trade barriers).
      3. Value Non-Tradable Goods at Shadow Prices: Estimate the shadow prices of non-tradable goods, reflecting the opportunity cost of producing them domestically.
      4. Calculate the Social Cost-Benefit Ratio: Calculate the ratio of the present value of social benefits to the present value of social costs, using the CRI as the discount rate.
    • Advantages: Provides a more rigorous and consistent framework for SCBA. Uses world prices, which are less subject to manipulation than domestic prices.
    • Disadvantages: Can be more complex to apply than the UNIDO approach, especially in estimating shadow prices for non-tradable goods. Requires detailed information on trade patterns and production costs.

Both the UNIDO and LM approaches provide valuable frameworks for conducting SCBA. The choice of which approach to use depends on the specific circumstances of the project and the availability of data and resources. In practice, a hybrid approach that combines elements of both methodologies is often used.

Back to top